Rw8 Vs Rw4 Wavemakers
I read from few people that have tried RW8 in 2 foot and seems like the flow is just too much and have to be dialled down to the minimum.
The following is flow rate comparison between its younger brother RW4 and RW8:
500 - 4000 L/h vs 700 - 8000 L/h
At the moment, I am running RW4 at its full capacity and pointing upward to the surface.
I was thinking of getting 2 x RW8 but reading from the comments by @Wrangy and @chimaera , I freak out a bit.
Are they really that powerful?
As I am running full capacity of RW4, wouldn't half capacity of RW8 matches that?
I guess the intention of getting bigger wavemakers so when I upgrade in the future, I can still make use of it.
What's your thought on having 2x RW8 on a CADE HL600 2 foot approx. 200L volume with view of gearing towards SPS in the future.
Isn't it better to have more power and dial down as required?
The following is flow rate comparison between its younger brother RW4 and RW8:
500 - 4000 L/h vs 700 - 8000 L/h
At the moment, I am running RW4 at its full capacity and pointing upward to the surface.
I was thinking of getting 2 x RW8 but reading from the comments by @Wrangy and @chimaera , I freak out a bit.
Are they really that powerful?
As I am running full capacity of RW4, wouldn't half capacity of RW8 matches that?
I guess the intention of getting bigger wavemakers so when I upgrade in the future, I can still make use of it.
What's your thought on having 2x RW8 on a CADE HL600 2 foot approx. 200L volume with view of gearing towards SPS in the future.
Isn't it better to have more power and dial down as required?
Last edited: